I am looking for someone to interview who has an in depth knowledge of both the political and technical sides of the nuclear race in Iran. If anyone reading this fits this or knows someone who does, please help out. What I am looking for is someone to answer via email a 15-20 question interview and then a paragraph or two about their personal thoughts on it.

The focus of the article is the US-Iran relations and why people in the US government should just stay out of the nuclear dealings of Iran.

Why US or European people don't give Nucléar industry to Iran based on Thorium ???
This item can't be use to make bomb.... and it's work fine....

Maybe you should post your questions here and see what everyone has to say about it.

Although Russia gave nuclear fuel to Iran to stop the Uranium Enrichment, Iran didn't do so! This means many things. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says that Iran isn't telling the whole truth. I think that the only liers in the world are the politicians of all nations, doesn't matter of which nation we're talking about! They all lie, they want just their own interests!

You should also do an article on how the US is the number one sponsor of terrorist....Like how they had Taliban on their pay role, and Sadam, and Israeli. And how those three groups are responsible for millions and millions of lives lost. So in turn to protect itself from terrorists shouldn’t they arm and protect themselves. Just trying to fuel the fire.

Israel isn't a terrorist group. It's a state with the right to protect itself!

sounds like kim jong il testing missile firing over or towards japan, and god knows how soon some jihad extremist can assume control of a suitcase warhead and walk into metro city somewhere.

bad idea is with that, when one is fired, a retaliation volley will be fired as a automatic response by westervile system, a self aware weapon system.

why should us stay out of iran nuke ordeal is the question, i can assume iran can make some good use of it, but then again, the threat of jihadist coming to iran for finances and gear for attacks on civilian targets as has been done for last 17 years makes it not good idea to drop the guard, they attacked new york 2 times so far, and not to mention countless other targets in years, subway train in spain, railway in japan, not to mention other countless and countless attacks on other countrys and targets, bars and stores, schools and churches, lets not forget the russian school attack.

with all the knowledge and history, would you be the political man in charge to be known as the one that let the jahadist get ahold of nuke weapons warfare and nail tons of innocent targets.

every country has the right to defend themselves, but take the 6 day war, there was no defense in attacking isreal, handful of nations made the attack, in which paid the price in the end of the 6 days, then saddam being useful during the iran hostage ordeal, we never expected him to test fire weapons on kurds to test for active use on iran, that be chemical alli himself,

so basically there is no yes or no answer here if thats what you are looking for, iran is entirely entitled to nuke power for use of commercial use of their power and other elements, but uranium grade three weapons grade,

there is no guarantee that a weapon will not be fired at isreal in hostility, or suitcase weapons be processed to move to targets, or even take a shot at india, and basically the world cannot afford for one mishap or lost weapon to find a prime target of innocent people, and the basic truth is the suitcase bombs does damage, but will be nothing like a mk84 crowd pleaser, a 3 stage inter continental balistic missile as response by the machine westervile targeting system and counter measure defense system.

Its a high price to pay, im not willing to pay someones life in iran or myself for sake of some ass in charge of weapons systems that dont like another man, just cause of his religion, his color, his beliefs, or his ideas.

Can any Iranians give me a quote on your opinion on the following question: If Iran continues to stand up to the bullying of the UN and the U.S., there is a possibility of invasion. Should that invasion take place, thousands upon thousands of lives would be lost. Is it worth it to even contemplate standing up to this kind of treatment to pursue a course that your government feels it has every right to pursue? Whether or not you are in agreement with the leaders of Iran, is it ever worth it to lay down the lives of thousands upon countless thousands of citizens in order to protect your country's right to make it's own decisions?

=================================================

The questions I have are as follows:

If you answer anything, please give a source...

1) If there are alternatives to weapons grade uranium, are both sides entertaining the notion of the use of them? Have there been any resolutions that might result in Iran getting commercial nuclear power without weapons grade materials?

2) Today the UN passed a 3rd wave of sanctions against Iran. The first two didn't work, why would these new rules? Is it because they are against specific people, companies and institutions?

3) Does it seem like Iran is realistically any more hostile that Israel or Iraq, or even Saudi Arabia? We as Americans have given a lot to SA to establish good relations. It was well known that the terrorists from 9/11 were mostly Saudi before Iraq was ever invaded, yet nothing was done. Is there anyway to justify these kinds of actions in situations like this?

4) Is nuclear technology as much of a threat anymore? With all of the things going on in the middle east, isn't it maybe even more of a threat to the people producing the weapons, as so many hostile people live in those areas? It can be said it only takes one, but when you have 10-15 extremists out of every 1000 people (that's hypothetical) as opposed to perhaps one in a million on US soil, are we really the ones who should be worried?

5) Following that, are we placing sanctions on countries that are not our strong allies who have the ability to produce chemical weapons? It seems these are a bit more worrisome. What have we done, in comparison (the world as a whole, the UN in particular) to stop that threat?

6) Were it not for US relations with Israel, would any of this be taking place? Years ago the US was selling arms to Iran, now we're beating down their door and infringing on their rights with a proverbial battering ram. Can anyone come up with a better plan? Is there some way to be assured that even if Iran did have the technology to build bombs, isn't it to some degree assured that should they attack US soil, we could probably do a lot more damage to them to return the favor? Wasn't this the point of the whole arms race with Russia?

Israel isn't a terrorist group. It's a state with the right to protect itself!

Any one killing woman and children in the name of any cause is a terrorist in my book, even if you are state trying to protect yourself. It just shows that you are even lower than the terrorist. Thats the whole point of the torture trials going on here in the US, we want to show that we are different and better than that. This ideology should be the basis of all democratic nations foreign policy in conjunction with other laws such as the one not to negotiate with the terrorists demand.

In my opinion all this rhetoric will end when Obama wins office, and the Persian nation will once again be a great ally of the US in the vary hostile middle east.

Maybe my dear persianbolic you're saying that theUSA is a terrorist coz all of the killing in it's history,hmm maybe also Turkey who killed lot's of kurds, maybe the whole NATO for the invasion of Iraq (that means England,Italy,Germany,Spain),also China who made not few criminal acts, also Venezuela, oh oh how about India and Pakistan? We shouldn't forget Myanmar, and Sudan who's killing millions in Darfur and all the various conflicts in Africa, there's also Russia who killed lot's of Chechens! let's not forget Iran who killes people just because their gay or just because they opponent the Iranian regime.
Have a nice day